Važnost pregleda i određivanje preostalog veka trajanja cevovoda na naftnoj platformi

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Marko Jarić Sanja Petronić Saša Marković Marta Trninić Suzana Polić

Apstrakt

Naftna platforma je velika građevina sa objektima za bušenje bušotina za istraživanje, vađenje, skladištenje i preradu nafte i prirodnog gasa koji leži u stenovitim formacijama ispod morskog dna. Bušenje na otvorenom moru predstavlja izazove za životnu sredinu. Iako, srećom, nije bilo mnogo nesreća na oil platforms, šteta koja nastane je ogromna i u ljudskom i u materijalnom i u smislu zaštite životne sredine. Iz tog razloga, inspekcija opreme pod pritiskom je od velikog značaja. The risk to the pressure vessel in service can be failure due to material degradation. Jedan od tipičnih mehanizama degradacije materijala je korozija. U ovom radu će biti prikazana važnost inspekcije opreme pod pritiskom. Na konkretnom, praktičnom primeru će biti predstavljena inspekcija pipeline i određivanje corrosion rate i remaining life u cilju sprečavanja otkaza i materijalnih I ljudskih gubitaka.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Kako citirati
JARIĆ, Marko et al. Važnost pregleda i određivanje preostalog veka trajanja cevovoda na naftnoj platformi. Zbornik Međunarodne konferencije o obnovljivim izvorima električne energije – MKOIEE, [S.l.], v. 9, n. 1, aug. 2021. Dostupno na: <http://izdanja.smeits.rs/index.php/mkoiee/article/view/6651>. Datum pristupa: 03 july 2022
Sekcija
Poster sesija

Reference

[1] Ravikiran, N., V. S. Reddy, G. K.Kumar, Inspection Practices for Piping System Compo-nents 3D Modeling and Stress Analysis of Flare Piping, International Journal of Engineer-ing Trends and Technology (IJETT) ,16 , 3, 2014, pp 103-108.
[2] Devold, H., Oil and Gas Production Handbook – An introduction to oil and gas production, transport, refining and petrochemical industry, 3rd ed, ABB Industries, Oslo, 2013.
[3] Dey, P.K., S. 0. Ogunlana, S.Naksuksakul, Risk-based maintenance model for offshore oiland gas pipelines: a case study, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 10 ,3, 2004, pp. 169 – 183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/355251041055326
[4] Bertolini, M., M. Bevilacqua, F.E. Ciarapica, G. Giacchetta, Development of Risk-Based Inspection and Maintenance procedures for an oil refinery, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 22, 2009, pp. 244–253. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2009.01.003.
[5] Wang, X., Q. Duan, Improved AHP–TOPSIS model for the comprehensive risk evaluation of oil and gas pipelines, Petroleum Science, 16, 2019, pp.1479–1492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182- 019-00365-5
[6] Chang, M.G., C. M. Shu, K. N. Lin, Application of risk based inspection in refinery and pro-cessing piping, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 18, 2005, pp. 397–402, doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2005.06.036
[7] Kamsu-Foguem, B., Information structuring and risk-based inspection for the marineoil pipelines, Applied Ocean Research, 56. 2016, pp. 132–142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2016.01.009
[8] *** ASME B31.3-2014, Process Piping, The American Society for Mechanical Engineers. 2015.
[9] ***, API PR 571, Damage Mechanisms Affecting Fixed Equipment in the Refining Industry, 3rd ed, American Petroleum Institute, 2020
[10] Ishizaki, Y., F. Yonekawa, T. Yumoto, T. Suzuki, S. Hijikawa, Proceedings of the ASME 2017 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, PVP2017, Remaining life assessment of an external pressure vessel in creep range and inspection findings, Waikoloa, Hawaii, USA, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2017-65194
[11] Jayanto, S.T., M. Chendra, A. T. Wijayanta, AIP Conference Proceedings 2097, Estimating corrosion rate and remaining life of a pressure vessel of H2S absorber, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5098182
[12] ***, API 570, Piping Inspection Code: In-service Inspection, Rating, Repair, and Alteration of Piping Systems, 4th ed. American Petroleum Institute, 2016.
[13] ***, API 574, Inspection Practices for Piping System Components, 4th ed., American Petrole-um Institute, 2016..