Arhitekte i inženjeri: njihova raznolikost i jedinstvo u pokušaju da postignu cilj – zgrade sa neto nultom potrošnjom energije
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Objavljeno
Jan 20, 2017
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Apstrakt
Zahtevi za održivijom izgrađenom sredinom kao i potreba za udobnom i zdravijom unutrašnjom sredinom čine proces projektovanja sve složenijim. Zbog toga se menja uloga projektanata, arhitekata i inženjera koji su uključeni u proces projektovanja zgrade. U ovom istraživanju ispitan je uticaj primene morfoloških pregleda kao i odnos morfološkog pregleda kao vrste mentalnog modela projektnog tima. Primena morfoloških pregleda je imala pozitivan uticaj na celokupan učinak tima. Međutim, rezultati su bili drugačiji za arhitekte – oni su procenili da je primena prikladna, ali su takođe zaključili da je broj funkcija i rešenja koje su izradili manji. Ujedinjenje različitih disciplina jeste složen proces, s obzirom na raznolikost članova tima koji projektuju zgradu. Neophodno je obaviti dodatna istraživanja kako bi se odredilo da li je korisno primenjivati morfološki dijagram u kombinaciji sa mentalnim modelom projektnog tima.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Kako citirati
ZEILER, Wim.
Arhitekte i inženjeri: njihova raznolikost i jedinstvo u pokušaju da postignu cilj – zgrade sa neto nultom potrošnjom energije.
KGH – Klimatizacija, grejanje, hlađenje, [S.l.], v. 41, n. 1, p. 93-99, jan. 2017.
ISSN 2560-340X.
Dostupno na: <https://izdanja.smeits.rs/index.php/kgh/article/view/1363>. Datum pristupa: 17 apr. 2026
Broj časopisa
Sekcija
Tematski članci
Reference
[1] *** AIA, 2009, Getting from sustainable design to carbon neutral design, http://www.architecture.uwaterloo.ca/faculty_projects/terri/carbon-aia/process.html.
[2] Ball, L.J., T. C. Ormerod, 2000, Putting ethnography to work: the case for a cognitive ethnography of design, International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 53, 147 – 168.
[3] Burt, R. S., 2004, Structural Holes and Good Ideas, American Journal of Sociology 110(2), 349 – 399.
[4] Cross, N., H. Christiaans and K. Dorst (eds), 1996, Analysing design activity, Wiley, Chichester.
[5] Detienne, F., G. Martin, E. Lavigne, 2005, Viewpoints in Co-design: A Field Study in Concurrent Engineering, Design Studies, 26, 215 – 241.
[6] *** DGMR 2011, Accessed May 16th 2011 http://www.dgmr.nl/en/building-physics/
[7] Dong, A., 2005, The Latent Semantic Approach to Studying Design Team Communication, Design Studies,26, 445 – 461.
[8] Dorst, K., L. Royakkers, 2006, The design analogy: a model for moral problem solving, Design Studies 28(5), 463 – 483.
[9] Dykes, T. H., P. A. Rodges, M. Smyth, 2009, Towards a new disciplinary framework for contemporary creative design practice, CoDesign 5(2), 99 – 116.
[10] Goldschmidt, G., W. Porter, 2004, Design Representation, Springer Verlag, London.
[11] Gorse, C. A., S. Emmitt, 2003, Investigating Interpersonal Communication during Construction Progress Meetings: Challenges and Opportunities, Engineering, Construction, and Architectural Management, 10, 234 – 244.
[12] Hatchuel, A., 2002, Towards design theory and expandable rationality: the unfinished program of Herbert Simon, Journal of Management and Governance 5(3 – 4), 260 – 273.
[13] Heylighen, A., H. Cavallin, M. Bianchin, 2009, Design in Mind, Design Issues 25(1): 94 – 105.
[14] Holzer, D. C. C., 2009, Sense-making across collaborating disciplines in the early stages of architectural design, PhD thesis, School of Architecture and Design, Design and Social Context Portfolio, RMIT University, October 2009.
[15] Hugill, D., 2004, Commercial Negotiation: Reaching for Disagreement within an Overall Project of Reaching for Agreement, Culture and Organization, 10, 163 – 187.
[16] Joyce, C. K., K. E. Jennings, J. Hey, J. C. Grossman, T. Kalil, 2010, Creativity and Innovation Management 19 (1), 57 – 67.
[17] Kang, H. J., S. Lee, E. K. Rhee, 2010, A Study on the Design Process of Zero Emission Building, Proceedings Clima 2010, Antalya.
[18] Kang, H. J., S. Lee, E. K. Rhee, 2010, A study on the design process of Zero Emission Building, Proceedings Clima 2010, Antalya, Turky.
[19] Le Corbusier, 1960, Relation between architect and engineer, Science et vie, 1960.
[20] Lloyd, P., 1995, Can concurrent verbalization reveal design cognition?, Design Studies 16, 237 – 259.
[21] Lloyd, P., 2002, Softening up the Facts: Engineers in Design Meetings, Design Issues, 17, 67 – 82.
[22] Lloyd, P., J. McDonell, F. Reid, R. Luck, N. Cross, 2006, Case for Support AHRC: Research networks and Workshops Scheme, Design meeting Protocols, Design Research Symposium 7.
[23] Luck, R., 2003, Dialogue in Participatory Design, Design Studies, 24, 523 – 535.
[24] Marszal, A. J., P. Heiselberg, J. S. Bourelle, E. Musall, K. Voss, I. Sartori, A. Napolitano, 2011, Zero Energy Building – A review of definitions and calculation methodologies, Energy and Buildings Vol. 43(4), 971 – 979.
[25] McDonnell, J., 1997, Descriptive Models for Interpreting Design, Design Studies, 18, 457 – 473.
[26] McDonnell, J., P. Lloyd, 2009, Editorial, CoDesign 5(1), 1 – 4.
[27] Medway, P., B. Clark, 2002, Imagining the Building: Architectural Design as Semiotic Construction, Design Studies, 24, 255 – 273.
[28] Norrby, E. J. O., 2010, Analyses of design session, 2nd assignment 7y400 Design methodology, TU Eindhov.
[29] Norris, K. W., 1963, The Morphological Approach to Engineering Design, Proceedings Conference on design methods, London, September 1962, Pergamon Press.
[30] Reid, F. J. M., S. R. Reed, 2005, Speaker-centredness and participatory listening in pre-expert engineering design teams, Co-Design, 1, 39 – 60.
[31] Ritchey, T., 2004, Strategic Decision Support using Computerised Morphological Analysis, 9th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, Copenhagen.
[32] Ritchey, T., 2010, Wicked problems Social messes, Decision Support Modelling with Moprhological Analysis, Swedish Morphological Society, Stockholm.
[33] Ritter, V., 2010, Assessment of the guidelines for zero-emission architectural design, Proceedings Clima 2010 – 10th REHVA World Congress, 9 – 12 May, Antalya, Turkey.
[34] Rosenkopf, L., A. Nerkar, 2001, Beyond Local Search: Boundary-Spanning, Exploration and Impact in the Optical Disk Industry, Strategic management Journal 22: 287 – 306.
[35] Tang , J.C.,1990, Findings from Observational Studies of Collaborative Work, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34, 143 – 160.
[36] Torcellini, P., S. Pless, C. Labato, T. Hootman, 2010, Main Street Net-Zero Energy Buildings: The
Zero Energy Method in Concept and Practice, proceedings ASME Conference on Energy Sustainability, May 17 – 22, Phoenix.
[37] Williams, K., C. Dair, 2007, What is stopping sustainable Building in England? Barriers experienced by stakeholders in delivering sustainable developments, Sustainable Development 15(3): 135 – 147.
[38] Zeiler, W. E. Quanjel, P. Savanović, W. Borsboom, H. Trum, 2005, Integral Design Methodology for the Built Environment, Proceedings Design Research in the Netherlands, Eindhoven.
[39] Zeiler, W., P. Savanović, 2009, General Systems Theory based Integral Design Method, Proceedings ICED – ™09, Stanford.
[40] Zwicky, F., 1948, Morphological Astronomy, The observatory, Vol. 68 (.845), 121 – 143.
[2] Ball, L.J., T. C. Ormerod, 2000, Putting ethnography to work: the case for a cognitive ethnography of design, International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 53, 147 – 168.
[3] Burt, R. S., 2004, Structural Holes and Good Ideas, American Journal of Sociology 110(2), 349 – 399.
[4] Cross, N., H. Christiaans and K. Dorst (eds), 1996, Analysing design activity, Wiley, Chichester.
[5] Detienne, F., G. Martin, E. Lavigne, 2005, Viewpoints in Co-design: A Field Study in Concurrent Engineering, Design Studies, 26, 215 – 241.
[6] *** DGMR 2011, Accessed May 16th 2011 http://www.dgmr.nl/en/building-physics/
[7] Dong, A., 2005, The Latent Semantic Approach to Studying Design Team Communication, Design Studies,26, 445 – 461.
[8] Dorst, K., L. Royakkers, 2006, The design analogy: a model for moral problem solving, Design Studies 28(5), 463 – 483.
[9] Dykes, T. H., P. A. Rodges, M. Smyth, 2009, Towards a new disciplinary framework for contemporary creative design practice, CoDesign 5(2), 99 – 116.
[10] Goldschmidt, G., W. Porter, 2004, Design Representation, Springer Verlag, London.
[11] Gorse, C. A., S. Emmitt, 2003, Investigating Interpersonal Communication during Construction Progress Meetings: Challenges and Opportunities, Engineering, Construction, and Architectural Management, 10, 234 – 244.
[12] Hatchuel, A., 2002, Towards design theory and expandable rationality: the unfinished program of Herbert Simon, Journal of Management and Governance 5(3 – 4), 260 – 273.
[13] Heylighen, A., H. Cavallin, M. Bianchin, 2009, Design in Mind, Design Issues 25(1): 94 – 105.
[14] Holzer, D. C. C., 2009, Sense-making across collaborating disciplines in the early stages of architectural design, PhD thesis, School of Architecture and Design, Design and Social Context Portfolio, RMIT University, October 2009.
[15] Hugill, D., 2004, Commercial Negotiation: Reaching for Disagreement within an Overall Project of Reaching for Agreement, Culture and Organization, 10, 163 – 187.
[16] Joyce, C. K., K. E. Jennings, J. Hey, J. C. Grossman, T. Kalil, 2010, Creativity and Innovation Management 19 (1), 57 – 67.
[17] Kang, H. J., S. Lee, E. K. Rhee, 2010, A Study on the Design Process of Zero Emission Building, Proceedings Clima 2010, Antalya.
[18] Kang, H. J., S. Lee, E. K. Rhee, 2010, A study on the design process of Zero Emission Building, Proceedings Clima 2010, Antalya, Turky.
[19] Le Corbusier, 1960, Relation between architect and engineer, Science et vie, 1960.
[20] Lloyd, P., 1995, Can concurrent verbalization reveal design cognition?, Design Studies 16, 237 – 259.
[21] Lloyd, P., 2002, Softening up the Facts: Engineers in Design Meetings, Design Issues, 17, 67 – 82.
[22] Lloyd, P., J. McDonell, F. Reid, R. Luck, N. Cross, 2006, Case for Support AHRC: Research networks and Workshops Scheme, Design meeting Protocols, Design Research Symposium 7.
[23] Luck, R., 2003, Dialogue in Participatory Design, Design Studies, 24, 523 – 535.
[24] Marszal, A. J., P. Heiselberg, J. S. Bourelle, E. Musall, K. Voss, I. Sartori, A. Napolitano, 2011, Zero Energy Building – A review of definitions and calculation methodologies, Energy and Buildings Vol. 43(4), 971 – 979.
[25] McDonnell, J., 1997, Descriptive Models for Interpreting Design, Design Studies, 18, 457 – 473.
[26] McDonnell, J., P. Lloyd, 2009, Editorial, CoDesign 5(1), 1 – 4.
[27] Medway, P., B. Clark, 2002, Imagining the Building: Architectural Design as Semiotic Construction, Design Studies, 24, 255 – 273.
[28] Norrby, E. J. O., 2010, Analyses of design session, 2nd assignment 7y400 Design methodology, TU Eindhov.
[29] Norris, K. W., 1963, The Morphological Approach to Engineering Design, Proceedings Conference on design methods, London, September 1962, Pergamon Press.
[30] Reid, F. J. M., S. R. Reed, 2005, Speaker-centredness and participatory listening in pre-expert engineering design teams, Co-Design, 1, 39 – 60.
[31] Ritchey, T., 2004, Strategic Decision Support using Computerised Morphological Analysis, 9th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, Copenhagen.
[32] Ritchey, T., 2010, Wicked problems Social messes, Decision Support Modelling with Moprhological Analysis, Swedish Morphological Society, Stockholm.
[33] Ritter, V., 2010, Assessment of the guidelines for zero-emission architectural design, Proceedings Clima 2010 – 10th REHVA World Congress, 9 – 12 May, Antalya, Turkey.
[34] Rosenkopf, L., A. Nerkar, 2001, Beyond Local Search: Boundary-Spanning, Exploration and Impact in the Optical Disk Industry, Strategic management Journal 22: 287 – 306.
[35] Tang , J.C.,1990, Findings from Observational Studies of Collaborative Work, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34, 143 – 160.
[36] Torcellini, P., S. Pless, C. Labato, T. Hootman, 2010, Main Street Net-Zero Energy Buildings: The
Zero Energy Method in Concept and Practice, proceedings ASME Conference on Energy Sustainability, May 17 – 22, Phoenix.
[37] Williams, K., C. Dair, 2007, What is stopping sustainable Building in England? Barriers experienced by stakeholders in delivering sustainable developments, Sustainable Development 15(3): 135 – 147.
[38] Zeiler, W. E. Quanjel, P. Savanović, W. Borsboom, H. Trum, 2005, Integral Design Methodology for the Built Environment, Proceedings Design Research in the Netherlands, Eindhoven.
[39] Zeiler, W., P. Savanović, 2009, General Systems Theory based Integral Design Method, Proceedings ICED – ™09, Stanford.
[40] Zwicky, F., 1948, Morphological Astronomy, The observatory, Vol. 68 (.845), 121 – 143.